HUD HQ staff have consistently discouraged these applications for numerous reasons, most notably that they are difficult to underwrite as operating expenses and reserves tend to be higher due to the increased exposure of exterior areas. There are different categories of portfolios.

  1. Checkerboard type with various segments of units scattered throughout, which increases
    HUD’s risk as there is no control over other contiguous units.
  2. Individual lots each having its own legal title – usually combined with different unit types and
    ages, making it difficult to underwrite from a capital needs perspective and expense/reserve
    perspective, many times with cash out.
  3. Self‐contained site with one legal description involving newly constructed units with
    recreation, leasing office and community building accessible only to the renters. Of all the
    variations, this would be the most palatable, however this model is currently being developed
    by some single ‐ family sales developers who seem to be meeting this niche.
Greg Hunter Changed status to publish July 6, 2021
Copyright © 2021 HUD221d4.com. HUD221d4.com is a PHA Capital company. This website is owned by a private company that offers business advice, information and other services related to multifamily, commercial real estate and other financing. We do not provide legal, accounting, or brokerage advice. We have no affiliation with any government agency and are not a lender. By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies, our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use cookies to provide you with a great experience and to help our website run effectively. You also understand that we are not affiliated with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). If you need to visit the FHA directly please visit www.hud.gov.